The manufacturers of AFFF are destined to fall on their own swords for producing carcinogenic firefighting foams. More civilians, as well as military firefighters, are filing a train of AFFF lawsuits against the AFFF manufacturers, including 3M and DuPont. 3M is between the devil and the deep blue sea as they are facing 3M earplug lawsuits and 3M AFFF foam lawsuits at the same time.
Do you ever wonder why there is such a hue and cry about life-saving firefighting foam? The firefighters use AFFF to smother huge fires and protect the people, but their own lives are at stake when exposed to the dangerous toxins of AFFF.
Let us delve into the details of the AFFF and how it is dangerous. You can also get a detailed account of the latest AFFF foam lawsuit updates and the PFAS lawsuit settlement amounts.
What does AFFF Foam Stand for?
AFFF stands for Aqueous Film-Forming Foam. It is a firefighting substance that firefighters primarily use to smother fires caused by flammable liquids. It is made from fluoride-based chemicals such as perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl, known as PFAS. They are desired for fire suppression because they can extinguish dangerous fuel fires faster than any other method. AFFF quickly spreads across the surface of the fuel, divesting the fire of oxygen and quickly extinguishing even large fires, and it also keeps the hot fuel from igniting again.
When compared to the AFFF, the protein-based biodegradable FFFP is very slow in providing the desired impact on the fast-spreading natured fuel fire. As a result, AFFF is regarded as unavoidable for extinguishing disastrous fires.
Is AFFF Foam Toxic?
The AFFF, while intended to protect people from fire, contains toxic chemicals that are extremely dangerous to people when exposed to them for an extended period of time. These chemicals are called ‘forever chemicals’ as they will not degrade or break down easily. Even after a thousand years, it will not degrade and will contaminate both surface and underground water. When people consume it on a regular basis, it causes a variety of serious health problems, including cancer.
The Aftermath of Using AFFF
The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) has employed firefighting foam in the Navy and other branches of the military since the 1970s. Though by the 1980s, studies on the chemicals used in firefighting foam had discovered that those who were exposed to it could face major environmental and health concerns, the manufacturers, as well as the Department of Defense, continued to utilize the substance to battle fires, endangering civilians and military firefighters.
The firefighters are exposed to these toxic chemicals not only when they put out accidental fires but also when they practice fire extinguishing drills. Even if they wear protective equipment, prolonged exposure to the toxins is hazardous to their health.
Military and Navy personnel, like firefighters, are frequently exposed to AFFF foam as part of their training and service in emergency situations. As it is impossible for them to avoid it, their health is jeopardized.
Airport personnel must also use AFFF as a part of their training to learn how to suppress fires with AFFF. As a result, they will hold firefighting drills on a regular basis.
Don’t assume that AFFF will only affect firefighters, airport workers, and Navy and Army personnel because they use them frequently. Citizens who are not associated with these professions are also at risk. The chemical toxin can be found near the factories that produce them, and when the waste seeps through the ground and contaminates the waterways and underground water, the lives of those who drink the water are also put at risk.
It can be found in the environment where the AFFF is used to suppress fires. We can breathe a sigh of relief that it is only once if that happens in rare accident sites. However, people who live near bulk fuel storage facilities, chemical plants, firefighting training sites, military airport hangars, plane crash sites, oil refineries, and flammable liquid processing facilities should be aware that they are at risk because fires and the use of AFFF are more common in their area.
The Environmental Working Group (EWG) has created a map that shows the locations of both suspected and affirmed contamination, as well as pertinent information for those who might be exposed.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a health alert report in 2016 stating that laboratory animal research proved that PFAS exposure could lead to kidney and testicular cancer, as well as other negative health impacts. According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, PFAS chemicals might be linked to an increased risk of cancer and other health effects.
A recent study has found many sites with nearby affected communities, including Naval Air Station Whiting Field in Florida, Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base Willow Grove and Mechanicsburg Naval Inventory Control Point in Pennsylvania, Grayling Army Airfield in Michigan, Naval Air Station Whidbey Island, Joint Base Lewis-McChord at the Yakima Training Ground and Naval Base Kitsap-Bremerton, all in Washington.
How is AFFF Foam Hazardous?
Direct exposure to AFFF or the ingestion of contaminated water would make vulnerable people to be affected by the following types of cancers.
- Bladder cancer
- Breast cancer
- Kidney cancer
- Leukemia
- Liver cancer
- Lymphoma
- Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
- Ovarian cancer
- Pancreatic cancer
- Prostate cancer
- Testicular cancer
As per the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, continuous exposure to the toxic chemicals in the AFFF could cause the following diseases apart from the list of cancers discussed above.
- Asthma
- Crohn’s disease (a chronic inflammatory bowel illness)
- Fertility problems
- Elevated cholesterol
- Liver disease
- Kidney disease
- Neurological illnesses
- Developmental changes in the fetus
- Developmental changes in children
- Thyroid disease
- Hypertension during pregnancy
Preventive Measures
Several states have banned the use of PFAS-based foams like AFFF and AR-AFFF. According to the Environmental Working Group (EWG), there are now safer and very effective alternatives to AFFF in the market, like GFFF, a fluorine-free foam replacement.
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Reauthorization Act was passed by Congress in 2018. According to the organization’s aim for Safer Chemicals, Healthy Families,- the FAA Reauthorization Act included an amendment that allowed both commercial aircraft manufacturers and US commercial airports to opt out of using PFAS-containing foams by 2021. Furthermore, according to the National Defense Authorization Act of 2020, all the departments of Defense Fire have to stop using AFFF and AR-AFFF completely by 2024.
Evolution of AFFF Lawsuits
According to the U.S Environmental Protection Agency, 3M, the Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, which was the primary PFOS manufacturer in the United States, voluntarily terminated PFOS production beginning in 2002. In 2006, other companies began to phase out PFOA production. However, those who were exposed to it for a long time had already started showing symptoms of diseases caused by toxic chemicals.
A slew of AFFF foam cancer lawsuits has been filed against the Maplewood-based manufacturing behemoth 3M over its former PFAS production, including one that resulted in an $850 million settlement with the state of Minnesota in 2018. Analysts think that 3M has to set aside hundreds of millions of dollars to meet future firefighter foam cash settlements and court awards.
The AFFF fire foam lawsuits alleged that the manufacturers like 3M, DuPont, and other companies manufactured, advertised, and sold the carcinogenic AFFF, despite knowing its toxicity. Not only the independent plaintiffs but also many counties and states also started pursuing firefighter foam lawsuits against the manufacturers for direct exposure and water contamination.
All the AFFF foam lawsuits were consolidated in the federal court in South Carolina under MDL no. 2873 by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation in 2018 under Judge Richard M. Gergel. Adding the 92 new firefighting foam lawsuits filed the previous month, there are a total of 2586 pending AFFF class action MDLs as of June 16, 2022. With that number, AFFF became the 14th largest MDL in the United States. Many new lawsuits are being filed against the defendants.
Petrial Daubert challenges and applications for summary judgment have a new date of August 15, 2022. The first bellwether trial case recommendations must be filed by October 14, 2022. The preliminary discovery in the first round of the bellwether AFFF cancer lawsuit trials is slated to commence in March 2023.
In the new Case Management Order, the AFFF MDL judge stated that the first bellwether test trial case would be chosen by the end of December 2022, with the bellwether trial date set for April 2023. The setting of a trial date is expected to kick off settlement talks leading to a global firefighting foam settlement.
According to a recent study conducted by the Maine Medical Center Research Institute, PFAS, the toxic “forever chemicals” found in AFFF firefighting foam, can decrease bone mineral density in adolescent boys, which can lead to bone fractures and a variety of other orthopedic problems, in addition to the diseases mentioned above. It is hoped that this will help to strengthen the plaintiffs’ claims during the ongoing AFFF lawsuits.
As the recent update in September 2022, 3M filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that the “government contractor” defense should shield it from liability for injuries caused by its firefighting foam products. However, the judge in the firefighting foam class action dismissed 3M’s government contractor defense. This is, in a way, a solace win for the AFFF victims.
Stay tuned with us for the latest 3M AFFF foam lawsuit update 2025.
AFFF Navy Lawsuit
In the AFFF lawsuit navy filed by Michael Sloane, he alleged that during his service as a firefighter in the United States Navy from 1980-1983, he did not get any warning from the manufacturers. His exposure to AFFF chemicals developed testicular cancer in him in 2006. He came to know the cause of the ailment in 2010.
His lawsuit filed in August 2021 demanded compensation for the given damages.
- Medical and hospital bills for diagnosing, treating, and monitoring injuries
- Temporary and permanent physical injury
- Economic damages
- Shame, shame, and anxiety
- Loss of enjoyment of life
- Annoyance and inconvenience
- Serious and severe emotional misery
- Mental pain and suffering
Are you affected like Sloane? Get your medical records reviewed by an experienced medical record review company.
Get the winning edge with comprehensive medical record review!
Latest AFFF Lawsuit Updates 2022
The MDL court has appointed a settlement mediator, retired judge Layn Phillips, to reach a global settlement in AFFF lawsuits. He will face a difficult time handling the cancer lawsuits by the firefighters as well as the water contamination lawsuits from the various communities.
As per the latest update, until November 15, 2022, around 3,300 pending AFFF lawsuits in the MDL no. 2873. more than 100 lawsuits were added each month, increasing the tally of lawsuits in the MDL.
In the previous month, the case filed by the City of Stuart against 3M Company et al. (2:18-cv-3487) was chosen as the first case for the test trial. It was a water contamination lawsuit filed by a city in Florida.
Prima facie pre-trial motions must be submitted by February 3, 2023, and the trial is scheduled to start on June 5, 2023.
Beginning in 2022, Prince George’s County, Maryland, and the City of San Diego, California, filed water contamination lawsuits against firefighting foam producers such as DuPont, Chemours, 3M, and others for contaminating local waterways. In the first week of November 2022, the cities of Baltimore and Philadelphia also joined the bandwagon to fight against those manufacturers for befouling their water systems.
The lawsuits alleged that the manufacturers had concealed the hazardous nature of the firefighting foam and marketed the product.
AFFF Firefighting Foam Lawsuit – 2023 Key Developments
Massive Growth in Cases: The AFFF MDL saw a sharp rise in cases, growing from about 3,400 to over 6,400 by the end of 2023. Hundreds of new lawsuits—especially firefighter cancer claims—were added each month.
Bellwether Trials Initiated: The first bellwether trial was scheduled in the U.S. District Court of South Carolina, overseen by Judge Richard Gergel. It involves water contamination claims, followed by a second phase focusing on personal injury claims, including cancer cases.
Key Scientific Evidence:
A NIST study revealed dangerously high PFAS levels in firefighters’ protective gear.
A CDC firefighter cancer registry was launched to track exposure-related illnesses.
Peer-reviewed research linked PFAS exposure to testicular, prostate, and thyroid cancer, especially among military personnel.
A new category of Telomer-based AFFF claims emerged, involving different PFAS variants.
Notable Lawsuits Filed: High-profile personal injury cases included those from firefighters and veterans suffering from prostate, kidney, and testicular cancers, attributed to long-term AFFF exposure.
Settlement Progress:
3M proposed a $10.3 billion settlement for water contamination claims from municipalities.
DuPont, Chemours, and Corteva agreed to a $1.185 billion settlement.
These settlements received preliminary court approval, with a Final Fairness Hearing scheduled.
Kidde-Fenwal Inc. was removed from upcoming trials due to bankruptcy.
Next Steps in Litigation:
28 personal injury cases were ordered for inclusion in the second bellwether trial pool.
Fact discovery began for selected cases.
Average payout amounts and final resolution timelines are still pending.
AFFF MDL 2873 Update – Key Developments 2024
Mass Litigation Growth:
The AFFF MDL (MDL 2873) grew significantly, reaching over 9,500 active lawsuits by August 2024, before dropping to 7,150 by November 2024 due to ongoing settlements and dismissals.
Water Contamination Settlements:
3M proposed a long-term settlement to purify 12,000 public water systems, to be paid over 13 years.
Tyco Fire Products agreed to a $750 million settlement for PFAS-contaminated water systems in May 2024.
Carrier Global settled for $730 million in October 2024, helping bankrupt Kidde-Fenwal resolve over 4,400 PFAS lawsuits.
Several voluntary dismissals in 2024 hint at ongoing confidential settlements.
Personal Injury Claims & New Diagnoses:
Plaintiffs have expanded cancer claims to include thyroid and liver cancer, in addition to existing cancers linked to PFAS.
New lawsuits include wrongful death claims and serious illnesses like testicular cancer, thyroid disease, and lymphoma linked to AFFF and firefighter gear.
Scientific Evidence & Regulatory Impact:
Plaintiffs and defendants are presenting scientific studies to support claims.
Studies continue to connect PFAS exposure to various cancers and diseases.
Massachusetts is moving to ban PFAS in firefighting gear by 2027.
Corporate Misconduct:
Evidence reveals that manufacturers like 3M and DuPont knew PFAS risks for decades and withheld this information from the public.
This history of negligence and cover-ups may trigger punitive damages in future trials.
Update on Bellwether Pool 2024
Out of the 25 lawsuits chosen for the first bellwether pool are narrowed down and included in two groups.
| Details | Group A | Group B | |
| Lawsuits | Number of lawsuits | 6 lawsuits | 5 lawsuits |
| Type | Kidney Cancer-3, testicular cancer-3 | ulcerative colitis-2, Thyroid disease-3 | |
| Dead lines | Discovery extension (tier 1) | 06/04/2024 to 06/18/2024 | n/a |
| Bellwether trial selection proposals | 7/2/2024 | 7/2/2024 | |
| Additional Fact Discovery | 07/16/2024 to 10/16/2024 | 07/16/2024 to 12/16/2024 | |
| Plaintiffs’ Expert Disclosures | 11/15/2024 | 5/12/2025 | |
| Defendant’s Expert Disclosures | 12/20/2024 | 6/16/2025 | |
| Plaintiffs’ Rebuttal Expert Disclosures | 1/10/2025 | 6/30/2025 | |
| Completion of Expert Depositions | 2/14/2025 | 7/31/2025 | |
| Filing Summary Judgment/Daubert Motions | 3/6/2025 | n/a | |
| Responses to Motions | 4/3/2025 | n/a | |
| Replies Supporting Motions | 4/17/2025 | n/a |
In the second group of lawsuits chosen for the bellwether trial included cases with liver and thyroid cancers. Judge Gergle indicated in a case management order issued on May 15 that other types of cancer claims related to AFFF will be dismissed allowing the plaintiffs to file their claims again within four years, if new studies establish their cases with AFFF exposure. If they need to continue with the lawsuits, they should provide expert studies supporting their injuries with 240 days of filing their claims.
May 2025 Update
There is a steady progress in increasing AFFF cancer claims in the MDL. The total claims moved up to 9,342.
The AFFF firefighting foam lawsuits are pushing toward settlements due to significant risks for defendants. A first trial is set for October 2025, but experts expect that defendants may settle earlier to avoid trial risks.
Plaintiffs filed a motion to consolidate five bellwether lawsuits for a single jury trial, citing shared facts about PFAS-contaminated water near a Pennsylvania military base.
- Commonalities: All cases involve urology-related cancers, same defendants, Pennsylvania law, shared experts, and high PFAS exposure in one community.
- Plaintiffs: Three kidney cancer claims (Clinton Speers, Brock Donnelly, Kevin Voelker): All had surgery and require ongoing monitoring. Two testicular cancer claims (Michael Bien, Alex Field): Both had testicle removal and chemotherapy.
- Alternative Request: If full consolidation is denied, plaintiffs seek: Kidney cancer cases tried together and testicular cancer cases in a second trial.
- Defendants’ Response:
Oppose consolidation, citing jury prejudice
Propose Voelker’s case as the first individual trial
As per the latest update in June 2025, there are 10,391 lawsuits in the MDL. around 1,000 lawsuits were added in teh last month.
When will AFFF lawsuit be settled? Lawyers handling AFFF firefighter class action lawsuits expect that most of these lawsuits will be settled by the first half or 2025.
Studies Reveal Link Between AFFF and Various Cancers
Study Reveals AFFF and Colorectal Cancer
A 2015 PubMed study found that perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)—a PFAS chemical—increases the invasiveness of colorectal cancer DLD-1 cells. It activates the NF-κB pathway, boosting MMP-2 and MMP-9 expression, which promotes cancer cell invasion.
These findings support potential claims in AFFF-related colorectal cancer lawsuits.
PFAS Can Be Absorbed by Skin: New Study Unveils
A University of Birmingham study, led by Oddný Ragnarsdóttir, confirmed that PFAS can be absorbed through the skin. Using 3D human skin models, researchers found:
Shorter-chain PFAS are more likely to be absorbed.
Longer-chain PFAS, like PFUnDA (66.5%) and PFNS (68.3%), are retained in skin tissue.
Dermal exposure is a significant PFAS absorption route.
This supports firefighter AFFF exposure claims, especially through skin contact.
A New Study Reveals 60% Higher Cancer Risk
A U.K. study of 672 Scottish firefighters found they have a 60% higher cancer death risk than the general public. Key findings:
Prostate cancer death rate is 4x higher; leukemia is 3x higher.
Increased risks of ischemic disease, stroke, kidney failure, and lung disorders.
This reinforces the link between AFFF exposure and elevated health risks in firefighters.
U.S. Defense Department Finds PFAS in 75% of Military Bases
A September 3, 2024 memo from the U.S. Department of Defense revealed that 75% of military bases have PFAS-contaminated water, mainly from AFFF use during drills. Cleanup at 578 bases will begin with highly contaminated private wells, following EPA drinking water standards and the CERCLA cleanup law.
PFAS Presence in Drinking Waters of Airway Heights
Dana Rowland’s University of Arizona study traced PFAS contamination in Airway Heights to landfills near Fairchild AFB where AFFF was used. Blood tests showed high PFAS in residents. Groundwater mapping confirmed contamination pathways, worsened by the lack of filtration systems, linking AFFF use to environmental pollution.
PFAS in Colorado Springs Triggers a Lawsuit
A Colorado woman, Madeline Stanger, has filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina, claiming she developed thyroid disease and ulcerative colitis from PFAS exposure in contaminated water near Colorado Springs. The lawsuit targets companies like 3M, DuPont, and BASF Corporation, alleging their firefighting foam (AFFF) polluted the local water supply. Stanger, who was diagnosed in 2022, claims long-term PFAS exposure from AFFF used at the Colorado Springs Municipal Airport caused her conditions.
Firefighter Turnout Gear PFAS Exposure
Like adding insult to injury, firefighters are not only endangered by the direct exposure to PFAS chemicals from the firefighting foams. It was identified in 2022 that even from their turnout gear they use during fire incidents can expose them to PFAS.
The International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF) and the Metropolitan Fire Chiefs Association warned the firefighters in August 2022 to restrict their use of turnout gears. They were asked to remove the gear once the emergency situation is over.
Removing PFAS presence completely from the gear is not that easy. The associations stated that protective gears without PFAS risk should be developed and made available for the firefighters to save them from cancer risks.
The bellwether pool on AFFF firefighting foam lawsuit update in 2025 will brighten the hope of the plaintiffs. Stay updated on the AFFF lawsuit update 2025 by visiting our blog.
Kidney Cancer Claim
On March 27, 2024, plaintiff Regina Brown filed an individual complaint against the AFFF manufacturers for her kidney cancer, which ended in kidney removal. She consumed the water from public water supplies in Pennsylvania, which was contaminated with fluorochemical products. She developed kidney cancer and underwent nephrectomy surgery and continue to suffer the aftermath of cancer.
She alleged that the defendants developed and marketed fluorochemical products consisting of Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA), Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), Perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA), Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS), Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBS), and Hexafluoropropylene Oxide (HFPO). Judge Richard Gergel was appointed to handle her case. She claimed for punitive damages and restitution.
She purported the following allegations:
- Product liability
- Defective design
- Failure to warn
- Negligence and gross negligence
- Negligent misrepresentation
- Fraudulent concealment
- Negligence per se
- Past and continuing trespass and battery
- Negligent or intentional and reckless infliction of emotional distress
Defendants in the AFFF Lawsuit
The following are some of the AFFF manufacturers who are being sued for hiding the dangerous nature of the substance from the government and the public:
- 3M Company
- AGC Chemicals Americas Inc.
- Amerex Corporation
- Angus Fire Armour Corporation
- Archroma Management, LLC
- Arkema, Inc.
- Asahi Glass Co., LTD
- BASF Corporation
- Buckeye Fire Equipment Company
- Carrier Global Corporation;
- Chemdesign Products, Inc.
- Chemguard, Inc.
- Chemicals, Inc.
- Chemours Company FC, LLC
- Chubb Fire, Ltd.
- Clariant Corp.
- Corteva, Inc.
- Daikin America, Inc.
- Deepwater Chemicals, Inc.
- DuPont De Nemours Inc.
- Dynax Corporation
- Fire Products GP Holding, LLC
- GE Interlogix, Inc.
- G.V.C. Chemical Corporation
- Kidde-Fenwal, Inc.
- Kidde Plc
- Mine Safety Appliances Company, LLC
- Nation Ford Chemical Company
- National Foam, Inc.
- Rockwood Systems, Inc.
- Royal Chemical Company
- Russell Martin Industries, Inc
- The Chemours Company
- Tyco Fire Products LP
- United Technologies Corporation
- UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation, Inc.
AFFF Lawsuit Settlement Amounts
In 2017, DuPont and Chemours promised to pay $670.7 million as the AFFF lawsuit settlement amounts DuPont to settling 3,550 injury lawsuits related to PFOA pollution at the Washington Works Plant in West Virginia.
According to Bloomberg, in March 2020, an Ohio jury ordered DuPont to pay $50 million as an AFFF military lawsuit settlement to Travis Abbot, a man who claimed PFOA-contaminated drinking water caused him to develop testicular cancer.
3M announced in March 2020 that it would establish an AFFF stewardship program to support the proper disposal of its older AFFF products.
On January 7, 2021, attorneys representing Peshtigo, Wisconsin residents announced a firefighter foam cash settlement of $17.5 million with the defendants Tyco Fire Products, L.P., ChemDesign Inc., and Chemguard Inc. for the alleged contamination of drinking water wells in Peshtigo, Wisconsin.
By looking at the flow of prior MDL litigations, the current South Carolina AFFF firefighting foam lawsuits in the MDL are anticipated to be going toward a global settlement.
AFFF Lawsuit Tiers
The AFFF exposure attorneys estimate that the top-tier plaintiffs in the AFFF settlement will receive between $200,000 and $500,000. Second-tier plaintiffs could expect a settlement in the $150,000 to $300,000 range. Firefighter foam lawsuit settlement amounts of $75,000 or less are likely for the third and lower tiers. This PFAS settlement amounts per person could vary depending upon the severity of injuries and period of suffering.
Are You a Victim? What to do Next?
If you are a firefighter or a member of the military or Navy and are exposed to the AFFF toxic chemicals and later develop any forms of cancer discussed earlier, you stand a chance to file an AFFF cancer navy lawsuit. Even civilians in the contaminated area or near the danger zones have all the legal rights to pursue the fire foam lawsuit.
First, contact an expert attorney fighting for the victims of exposure to toxic chemicals to ensure a deserved compensation. To proceed with your AFFF litigation, your attorney will concentrate on the following things first.
- Gather the occupational evidence of exposure, like work history and work environment, to prove exposure to PFAS.
- Collate your medical records for evidence of cancer diagnosis, including imaging and laboratory testing reports and medical bills.
- File the AFFF lawsuit on your behalf.
- Try to negotiate an AFFF lawsuit settlement with the manufacturers.
- Proceed with the legal claim in court if the settlement is not reached.
Most of the attorneys work on contingency fees to lessen your financial burden during the lawsuit proceedings. They know that a cancer diagnosis would not simply end with little medical expense. It will add up as you have to undergo surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, and sometimes expensive immunotherapy to aid in the advanced treatment of cancer.
The defendants are held accountable for
- Negligence
- Misrepresentation
- Concealment and fraud
- Failure to warn
- Past, continuing, and permanent trespass and battery
- Intentional infliction of emotional distress
The amount of compensation you are entitled to is determined by the facts of your case, such as – the extent of your exposure to PFAS-containing foams affecting your long-term prognosis and the severity of your illness. The extent of your pain and suffering if you lost earning capacity as a result of a disability caused by your exposure to fire-extinguisher foams.
You are entitled to get reparation for the following damages:
- Past and present medical expenses
- Projected future medical expenses
- Out-of-the-pocket expenses
- Lost wages and loss of earning capacity in the future
- Pain and suffering
- Emotional distress
- Loss of consortium
- Funeral expenses in case of death of the victim
- Expenses for the palliative care
- Punitive damages for producing and selling AFFF despite knowing its carcinogenic nature
You can file an individual AFFF firefighters foam lawsuit or join a AFFF foam class action lawsuit with the help of experienced AFFF firefighter foam lawyers.
To summarize, while the AFFF is useful in suppressing fuel fires, the risks outweigh the benefits. If you suspect you were exposed as a civilian or military firefighter and have any of the diseases listed above, get a cancer diagnosis. An experienced doctor can detect cancer in its early stages. If the evidence points to AFFF involvement, never hesitate to contact an attorney, understand AFFF lawsuit update and file a lawsuit.
The skilled attorneys will collaborate with an expert medical record review company to sort through the valuable medical records that may support your claim. LezDo TechMed has recently worked with law firms on such MDL litigations as opioid lawsuits, Elmiron lawsuits, IUD ParaGard lawsuits, etc., and has an expert team to review your records. Our extraordinary medical record reviews will ensure your victory in your AFFF lawsuit.
Get a Free Case Evaluation From a Lawyer
Let us hope that the sign of bellwether trials in 2025 will be a torch bearer for fruitful resolution for those who have been wronged.
Stay strong and continue to fight the wrongdoers!
Follow our blog to know the AFFF lawsuit status and 3M AFFF foam lawsuit update 2025.
To get more insights, visit our Instagram:
View this post on Instagram
